Do Stocks Perform Better When Manufacturing Is Booming?
US manufacturing is booming.
In a report released this week, the ISM Manufacturing Index moved up to 61.3, the second-highest level in the last 30 years.
Data Source for all charts/tables herein: FRED, Bloomberg
Many are saying that’s great news for the stock market because increased manufacturing activity is evidence of a stronger economy. This seems logical but does the data support such a conclusion? And is it prudent to use manufacturing indicators to time your exposure to stocks?
Let’s take a look…
1) Is there evidence of outperformance in stocks following the highest ISM Manufacturing levels?
If we sort the ISM Manufacturing Index (going back to 1948) into deciles and compare the highest and lowest 10% of readings, we find above-average returns following the weakest readings and below-average returns following the strongest readings (highlighted row).
Over the subsequent year, the weakest ISM readings were followed by an average S&P 500 return of 25.6% versus a return of 5.5% for the strongest ISM readings. There is simply no evidence to justify a more bullish outlook on stocks following the strongest ISM readings.
2) Should you use ISM Manufacturing levels to time your exposure to stocks?
ISM Manufacturing readings above 50 indicate increased manufacturing activity while readings below 50 are said to indicate a contraction in activity.
Some pundits say you should only own stocks when ISM is above 50. Others say that you should look at the rate-of-change, and only own stocks when the ISM is positive year-over-year.
Going back to 1948/1949, how would these two strategies have fared versus a simple buy-and-hold? In both cases, far worse.
Note: in the “PMI YoY Strategy” you are buying the S&P 500 when PMI is positive year-over-year and selling the S&P 500 when it is negative year-over-year. In the “PMI Above/Below 50 Strategy” you are buying the S&P 500 when PMI is above 50 and selling the S&P 500 when PMI is below 50. For simplicity, this analysis ignores commissions, slippage, and taxes.
Why isn’t the ISM a good indicator for timing stocks?
There are certainly times when the ISM is weak and stocks continue to move lower, but there are also many times where ISM is exhibiting weakness (below 50 or down year-over-year) without ensuing stock market declines. Oftentimes, the stock market is already reflecting such weakness as the two variables are correlated (0.48 correlation between year-over-year changes in ISM and S&P 500). By the time the ISM data gets better again, the stock market may have already rallied, causing a whipsaw for investors that sold and now have to buy back in at higher levels. This assumes that the two variables move in tandem, which is not always the case (the correlation is far from perfect). There are plenty of examples where the stock market has ignored the current ISM reading altogether, focusing instead on other economic data points or looking ahead to better/worse future ISM reports.
Needless to say, there is no simple rule of thumb when it comes to ISM levels and what they may imply for the stock market.
Does that mean manufacturing activity is unimportant to the economy? No, just that using it to time your exposure to stocks does not appear to be an effective strategy. The fact that the best performance from stocks has historically come after the worst manufacturing readings tells us as much. The stock market is not the economy.
CHARLIE BILELLO, CMT
Charlie Bilello is the Director of Research at Pension Partners, LLC, an investment advisor that manages mutual funds and separate accounts. He is the co-author of four award-winning research papers on market anomalies and investing. Charlie is responsible for strategy development, investment research and communicating the firm’s investment themes and portfolio positioning to clients. Prior to joining Pension Partners, he was the Managing Member of Momentum Global Advisors. He previously held positions as a Credit, Equity and Hedge Fund Analyst at billion dollar alternative investment firms.
Charlie holds a J.D. and M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting from Fordham University. He has also done a B.A. in Economics from Binghamton University. He is a Chartered Market Technician (CMT) and also holds the Certified Public Accountant (CPA) certificate.
In 2017, Charlie was named the StockTwits Person of the Year. He has been named by Business Insider and MarketWatch as one of the top people to follow on Twitter. His work has also been featured in Barron’s, Bloomberg, and the Wall Street Journal.
You can follow Charlie on twitter here.
Pension Partners, LLC is a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. For more information about Pension Partners please visit: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/ and search for our firm name.
The information herein was obtained from various sources. Pension Partners does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information provided by third parties. The information given is as of the date indicated and believed to be reliable. Pension Partners assumes no obligation to update this information or to advise on further developments relating to it.
Past performance is not indicative nor a guarantee of future results.
This writing is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction. It also does not offer to provide advisory or other services by Pension Partners, LLC in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Pension Partners, LLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.
Comments are closed.